February 27, 2004
NO TEA AND SYMPATHY?:
The Anxiety of His Influence: Naomi Wolf recalls a night from 20 years ago. She once wrote about it differently. (MEGHAN COX GURDON, February 27, 2004, Wall Street Journal)
In 1997, Ms. Wolf recounted the incident in her book "Promiscuities," albeit veiling the identity of the amorous professor. In the book she makes clear that students knew that "Dr. Johnson" occasionally would "elect" girls with the right aura. One Saturday night, by pre-arrangement, the professor came over to her apartment with her manuscript and a bottle. In thrilled expectation, she had put out flowers, lit candles and taken particular care to dress attractively. And over the course of the evening she got room-spinningly drunk--a detail that does not appear in the New York magazine piece.It's not surprising that in "Promiscuities" she confesses to feelings of complicity in the brief hanky-panky that ensued. Yet in the New York magazine exposé, there is no acknowledgment of her inner excitement or her romantic preparations--there's just the frightened panting of a tender fawn chased by a big bad predator.
There's so much ugliness in this story, and in the publicizing of it, that it's difficult to know where to start. For one thing, Ms. Wolf's tale illustrates two impossibly contradictory strains in the feminist culture that she herself promotes. Women must be sexually shameless--meaning shame-free--and society should encourage female erotic exploration. Men, however, must observe a phenomenal degree of purity--in language, eye-movement, intentions and most definitely in the placing of heavy, boneless hands on women's thighs.
This reverse-Talibanism may make sense in the steamy atmosphere of a women's studies class, but it withers into absurdity in the fresh air of real life.
One doubts he'll resort to it, but this does offer Mr. Bloom the Marion Barry defense: "The [young lady in question] set me up." Posted by Orrin Judd at February 27, 2004 5:06 PM
If Wolf really was interested in context and not just text, it's too bad one of her early literature teachers did not tell her about Dylan Thamas's standard greeting to American co-ed lit. majors on his poetry-reading tours: "Can I jump you?"
Evidently, he had great success with it.
I don't recall the co-eds at Cow College's lit. school as being quite as dumb as Wolf.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 27, 2004 9:12 PMFrankly, I have to ask someone to clue me in on all this. I have a VERY vague idea who Naomi Wolf is, and equally a vague idea of who Harold Bloom is, but what I don't have is any very clear idea of why the devil I should care about either of them and what they may or may not have done in bed or out of it.
Posted by: Joe at February 27, 2004 10:01 PMJoe:
http://www.brothersjudd.com/blog/archives/011185.html
Posted by: oj at February 27, 2004 11:28 PMIt explains why she tossed her cookies and why Bloom was in such a rush to leave.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 28, 2004 1:12 AMJoe:
I have the same reaction. On reflection it's the same reaction I have when I'm in the supermarket checkout line and I read a "World Globe" headline such as "Brad to dump Clarissia".
Who ARE these people?
Posted by: Earl Sutherland at February 28, 2004 9:10 AMAll he did was touch her thigh, right? Is that it? That isn't even 1st base, it is barely getting to the on-deck circle. Can someone tell her to grow up?
Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 28, 2004 12:23 PMJoe, she's a Rhodes Scholar, along with Wesley Clark and Kris Kristofferson.
It is All-American to gloat over the stupidities of those who were anointed as smart.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 28, 2004 2:11 PMShe threw up because of too much wine and now she whines too much.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 28, 2004 4:38 PM