February 22, 2004
HE MUST BE ELECTABLE, HE CRUSHED WES, HOWARD, AND GUY SMILEY:
Mr. Likable vs. Mr. Electable (JOHN TIERNEY, 2/22/04, NY Times)
"Voters find Kerry aloof and distant," said Frank Luntz, a pollster who has conducted focus groups for MSNBC among primary voters in a half-dozen states. "They find Edwards smooth and enticing. Women really find him sexy. Men like his personality."Mr. Edwards has been criticized for not having enough government experience, but a pleasant disposition can overcome a lot of handicaps. Intellectuals made fun of Eisenhower's mangled syntax, but they were outnumbered by voters wearing "I Like Ike" buttons. Gary Hart's candidacy in 1988 was ended by his sexual indiscretion, but Bill Clinton survived his, thanks in no small part to his charm. Al Gore may have been a better debater than George W. Bush, but the audience was put off by his supercilious manner.
"A majority of Americans disagreed with Ronald Reagan's policies in 1984, but he won because they liked him personally," said Mr. Luntz, who has advised Republican candidates. "People look at presidential candidates in a special way because they can't get away from the president. They can ignore a senator or governor, but a president will be in their living rooms for four years. At a minimum they have to like him."
Michael Deaver, the crafter of Mr. Reagan's image, said that in his cheerfulness Mr. Edwards reminded him of Mr. Reagan, as did Mr. Edwards's response to criticisms by Mr. Kerry.
"Edwards responded to Kerry's negative statement by saying, 'Well, I wouldn't put it that way. I would say it this way,' " Mr. Deaver recalled. "That was exactly the way Reagan would rephrase a negative question and put a positive twist on it."
Daniel Hill, the author of "Body of Truth," an analysis of body language, has studied the candidates' styles by tracking 23 facial expressions during televised debates. He counts, for instance, the number of "social smiles" using just the mouth, "genuine smiles" using the eyes and mouth and signs of disgust or anger.
"Dean consistently showed anger by pressing his lips together or tensely holding his mouth slightly open," Mr. Hill said. "Last fall, Kerry was showing definite signs of contempt and disgust by raising his upper lip, but that's gone now. He's trying to be more likable by smiling more, but rarely can he get past the social smile to the genuine smile. Edwards gets there much more often. He conveys the most optimism, and lately he's been adding gravitas by knitting his eyebrows to show that he feels the pain of the other America."
If Mr. Edwards wins the charm contest, why is Mr. Kerry winning the primaries? Likability is not everything, especially in times of war.
Choosing an aloof, unlikable, alpha male to take on George W. Bush worked so well last time... Posted by Orrin Judd at February 22, 2004 9:56 AM
"A majority of Americans disagreed with Ronald Reagan's policies in 1984, but he won because they liked him personally."
Is this a vacuous, meaningless statement, which you can prove it only by finding one policy where it works. Or was it meant to paint an comprehensive picture of the public weighted assesment of Reagan policies in 1994. If the latter, I must have spent the whole Summer and Fall of 1984 in a drunken stupor...
Posted by: MG at February 22, 2004 10:19 AMI noticed that passage too, MG. Although I did do a little bit of drinking in those days, I remember well enough to know that this guy's full of it.
Posted by: NKR at February 22, 2004 11:31 AMOJ
"choosing an aloof, unlikable, alpha male..worked so well last time"
Actually it did work, in the sense the he ah...
got the more votes.
Gore wasn't an alpha male, he was pretending to be one.
Posted by: Carter at February 22, 2004 2:28 PMCaught part of Kerry and Edward's interviews this AM on George Stepanopolouses "This Week" and their responses to clips of GW speaking on Iraq.
If I understood it, they both stated they'd do everything GW did ... BUT ... they'd have done it better.
Bwahahahaha!
Posted by: Genecis at February 22, 2004 2:30 PMh:
He was an incumbent in a time of unprecedented peace and prosperity--he deserved to win.
Posted by: oj at February 22, 2004 4:25 PMThe biggest weakness Edwards has is that there is no voir dire with the electorate. That is why he is not running again in NC.
Posted by: jim hamlen at February 22, 2004 10:15 PM