October 24, 2003

STRANGE, WE THOUGHT THAT WAS EXACTLY WHAT HE SAID:

The Widening Crusade: Bush's War Plan Is Scarier Than He's Saying (Sydney H. Schanberg, October 15 - 21, 2003, Village Voice)

If some wishful Americans are still hoping President Bush will acknowledge that his imperial foreign policy has stumbled in Iraq and needs fixing or reining in, they should put aside those reveries. He's going all the way--and taking us with him.

The Israeli bombing raid on Syria October 5 was an expansion of the Bush policy, carried out by the Sharon government but with the implicit approval of Washington. The government in Iran, said to be seeking to develop a nuclear weapon, reportedly expects to be the next target.

No one who believes in democracy need feel any empathy toward the governments of Syria and Iran, for they assist the terrorist movement, yet if the Bush White House is going to use its preeminent military force to subdue and neutralize all "evildoers" and adversaries everywhere in the world, the American public should be told now. Such an undertaking would be virtually endless and would require the sacrifice of enormous blood and treasure.


Maybe something like this:
Tonight we are a country awakened to danger and called to defend freedom. Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution. Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done. [...]

Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.

Americans are asking, why do they hate us? They hate what we see right here in this chamber - a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms - our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.

They want to overthrow existing governments in many Muslim countries, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan. They want to drive Israel out of the Middle East. They want to drive Christians and Jews out of vast regions of Asia and Africa.

These terrorists kill not merely to end lives, but to disrupt and end a way of life. With every atrocity, they hope that America grows fearful, retreating from the world and forsaking our friends. They stand against us, because we stand in their way.

We are not deceived by their pretenses to piety. We have seen their kind before. They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions - by abandoning every value except the will to power - they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will follow that path all the way, to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies.

Americans are asking: How will we fight and win this war? We will direct every resource at our command - every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence, and every necessary weapon of war - to the disruption and to the defeat of the global terror network.

This war will not be like the war against Iraq a decade ago, with a decisive liberation of territory and a swift conclusion. It will not look like the air war above Kosovo two years ago, where no ground troops were used and not a single American was lost in combat.

Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success. We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.

Our nation has been put on notice: We are not immune from attack. We will take defensive measures against terrorism to protect Americans. Today, dozens of federal departments and agencies, as well as state and local governments, have responsibilities affecting homeland security. These efforts must be coordinated at the highest level. So tonight I announce the creation of a Cabinet-level position reporting directly to me - the Office of Homeland Security.

And tonight I also announce a distinguished American to lead this effort, to strengthen American security: a military veteran, an effective governor, a true patriot, a trusted friend - Pennsylvania's Tom Ridge. He will lead, oversee and coordinate a comprehensive national strategy to safeguard our country against terrorism, and respond to any attacks that may come.

These measures are essential. But the only way to defeat terrorism as a threat to our way of life is to stop it, eliminate it, and destroy it where it grows.

Many will be involved in this effort, from FBI agents to intelligence operatives to the reservists we have called to active duty. All deserve our thanks, and all have our prayers. And tonight, a few miles from the damaged Pentagon, I have a message for our military: Be ready. I've called the Armed Forces to alert, and there is a reason. The hour is coming when America will act, and you will make us proud.

This is not, however, just America's fight. And what is at stake is not just America's freedom. This is the world's fight. This is civilization's fight. This is the fight of all who believe in progress and pluralism, tolerance and freedom. [...]

After all that has just passed - all the lives taken, and all the possibilities and hopes that died with them - it is natural to wonder if America's future is one of fear. Some speak of an age of terror. I know there are struggles ahead, and dangers to face. But this country will define our times, not be defined by them. As long as the United States of America is determined and strong, this will not be an age of terror; this will be an age of liberty, here and across the world.

Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we have found our mission and our moment. Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom - the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time - now depends on us. Our nation - this generation - will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.

It is my hope that in the months and years ahead, life will return almost to normal. We'll go back to our lives and routines, and that is good. Even grief recedes with time and grace. But our resolve must not pass. Each of us will remember what happened that day, and to whom it happened. We'll remember the moment the news came - where we were and what we were doing. Some will remember an image of a fire, or a story of rescue. Some will carry memories of a face and a voice gone forever.

And I will carry this: It is the police shield of a man named George Howard, who died at the World Trade Center trying to save others. It was given to me by his mom, Arlene, as a proud memorial to her son. This is my reminder of lives that ended, and a task that does not end.

I will not forget this wound to our country or those who inflicted it. I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people.

The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain. Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them.

Fellow citizens, we'll meet violence with patient justice - assured of the rightness of our cause, and confident of the victories to come. In all that lies before us, may God grant us wisdom, and may He watch over the United States of America.


What, did the Schanberg's of the world think he was joking?

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 24, 2003 6:38 AM
Comments

"[Our war] will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found..."

Name one terrorist group "of global reach" besides al Qaeda. Even the various other jihadi groups like Jemaah Islamiah are mostly focused on their own countries. Certainly Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah (Syria's main sponsorees) don't qualify as having global reach or aspirations.

Posted by: Peter Caress at October 24, 2003 8:07 AM

I for one AM in favor of using America's preeminent military force to subdue and neutralize all evildoers, that are unelected heads of nations. It would be a far from endless task, taking merely a few decades.

However, there would be some political difficulties with such an approach.


oj:

Haven't you said that you're against exactly the type of campaign that the President outlined in the speech ?
That isolation and nonengagement are better ? Like your preferred policy towards the USSR, back in the day.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at October 24, 2003 9:07 AM

Remeber, after returning from Cambodia, Sydney was forced out at The New York Times mainly because he didn't think the paper was liberal enough, so it's pretty easy to get what he's going to write about Bush foreign policy even before his first finger touches the keyboard.

Posted by: John at October 24, 2003 9:17 AM

OJ can answer for himself, but didn't someone say consistency was the hobgoblin of small minds.

Posted by: h-man at October 24, 2003 9:18 AM

Peter:

Hezbollah is active in South America, and its associates have been convicted in North Carolina of money-laundering. The same will probably happen in Michigan. Is that global enough for you?

Likewise, the breadth of membership of Al-Qaeda and the Southeast Asian terror groups along with Ansar Al-Islam covers Saudis, Yemenis, Chechens, Iranians, Syrians, Lebanese, Egyptians, along with Americans, Australians, and British citizens. Is that global enough for you?

Posted by: jim hamlen at October 24, 2003 9:40 AM

Al Qaeda is a syndicate of local Islamic terrorist groups around the globe. It does no violence to the word to say that all the constituent groups are "global." Thus, we're fighting a local group in the Phillipines, others in Africa, etc.

Posted by: David Cohen at October 24, 2003 10:15 AM

When you can reach anywhere on the globe for a $300 airline ticket, what terrorist group doesn't have global reach? Especially when the terrorists have shown they have an affinity for airplanes.

Posted by: pj at October 24, 2003 11:43 AM

I hadn't noticed, at the time, the statement:

"We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. "

Interesting. I wonder what the 'turn them one against another' is about?

Posted by: Mike Earl at October 24, 2003 11:52 AM

One global reach terrorist group?

The IRA. They seem to be getting around. Not doing the dirty work themselves, but training the islamofascists.

And David, start reading rantburg. Many groups under the same umbrella.

Posted by: Sandy P. at October 24, 2003 12:31 PM

JI was the group that carried out the attack in Bali, right? They were after Americans, but got mostly Australians. Global enough?

Posted by: NKR at October 24, 2003 2:24 PM

The IRA, which in the past has heavily funded by Red Sox Fans, has been connected to FARC in Columbia, who've had a hand in the recent coup in Bolivia.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at October 24, 2003 2:35 PM

FOOLISH consistency is the hobgoglin of little minds. Consistency, in and of itself, and when practiced wisely, is a hallmark of excellence.

Posted by: EO at October 24, 2003 2:37 PM

Islam is universalist and intolerant, so by definition any aggressive version of Islam is global.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 24, 2003 3:10 PM

Schanberg's piece is typical of those on the left who are too tired and too scared to fight. Do they perhaps prefer the alternative? What makes them think they would not be the first ones culled out and killed?

Would the journalistic class change its mind if a truck bomb drove into the NYT building?

Posted by: jim hamlen at October 24, 2003 3:40 PM

Mmmm....truck bomb.

Just kidding.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at October 24, 2003 4:54 PM

Bush has found a wonderful way to baffle his enemies: say what he's going to do, then do it. Takes 'em by surprise every time. Wonder how long it will take them to catch on?

Posted by: ralph phelan at October 25, 2003 12:29 AM

Going after terrorist groups that only target Israel and their government sponsors is a reasonable policy, but I don't think it's what Bush meant to say in that speech. Else why would he qualify his statement by talking about terrorist groups of "global reach"?

Listening to the speech, I didn't get the impression that Bush wanted to invade Iraq, Iran or Syria (all proud sponsors of anti-Israel terrorism). Indeed, Bush didn't decide to invade Iraq until August 2002. Talking about terrorists with global reach was a oblique way of limiting the context to terrorist groups, present and future, who dare kill Americans on American soil. At least that's what I thought when I heard the speech.

(Side note: This article about a captured JI manual gives some insight into JI's goals and plans: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/31/1062268475894.html )

Posted by: Peter Caress at October 25, 2003 2:23 AM
« HOW LONG A TRUCE?: | Main | LET THE WORLD COME TO YOU: »