October 11, 2003

DID ANYONE INSIDE THE BELTWAY NOT KNOW SHE WAS AT CIA?:

Secrets of the Scandal (NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF, October 11, 2003, NY Times)

[N]ow a few pertinent facts:

First, the C.I.A. suspected that Aldrich Ames had given Mrs. Wilson's name (along with those of other spies) to the Russians before his espionage arrest in 1994. So her undercover security was undermined at that time, and she was brought back to Washington for safety reasons.

Second, as Mrs. Wilson rose in the agency, she was already in transition away from undercover work to management, and to liaison roles with other intelligence agencies. So this year, even before she was outed, she was moving away from "noc" -- which means non-official cover, like pretending to be a business executive. After passing as an energy analyst for Brewster-Jennings & Associates, a C.I.A. front company, she was switching to a new cover as a State Department official, affording her diplomatic protection without having "C.I.A." stamped on her forehead.

Third, Mrs. Wilson's intelligence connections became known a bit in Washington as she rose in the C.I.A. and moved to State Department cover, but her job remained a closely held secret. Even her classmates in the C.I.A.'s career training program mostly knew her only as Valerie P. That way, if one spook defected, the damage would be limited.


Sounds like Bob Novak was the last, not the first, to know.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 11, 2003 11:50 PM
Comments

I have posted an important follow-up to this post. In summary - if Kristof is right about his facts, then there is no violation of the law.

Posted by: "Edward" at October 12, 2003 12:24 AM

Mr. Judd;

Didn't Plame tell Wilson that she was CIA the first night they met, according to Wilson? What does that say about the depth of her cover?

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at October 12, 2003 11:51 AM

That she was a sucker for a honeypot?

Posted by: OJ at October 12, 2003 11:54 AM

If Plame wasn't undercover why isn't the White House pushing this to defuse the scandal?

Posted by: AWW at October 12, 2003 12:54 PM

CIA won't acknowledge it.

Posted by: OJ at October 12, 2003 1:09 PM
« WHAT WILL WE DO WITHOUT JOHN PAUL II? | Main | 8 WORDS TO MINORITY STATUS: »