October 26, 2004
THE GRAY LADY'S CASE FOR THE WAR:
Iraq Explosives Become Issue in Campaign (DAVID E. SANGER, 10/26/04, NY Times)
The White House sought on Monday to explain the disappearance of 380 tons of high explosives in Iraq that American forces were supposed to secure, as Senator John Kerry seized on the missing cache as "one of the great blunders of Iraq" and said President Bush's "incredible incompetence" had put American troops at risk.
Gotta love the Times, which first invents the story and then disapassionately reports on it becoming part of the campaign.
Meanwhile, the gist of the story as even they report it suggests that the stuff was either WMD itself or WMD related and that it disappeared because we waited to long to attack Iraq:
On Monday evening, Nicolle Devenish, the spokeswoman for the Bush campaign, noted a section of the Times report indicating that American troops, on the way to Baghdad in April 2003, stopped at the Al Qaqaa complex and saw no evidence of high explosives. Noting that the cache may have been looted before the American invasion, she said Mr. Kerry had exaggerated the administration's responsibility."John Kerry presumes to know something that he could not know: when the material disappeared," Ms. Devenish said. "Since he does not know whether it was gone before the war began, he can't prove it was there to be secured."
While the White House sought to minimize the importance of the loss of the HMX and RDX - two commonly used military explosives that can also be used to bring down airplanes or to create a trigger for nuclear weapons - the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, took the unusual step on Monday of writing to the United Nations Security Council to report that the explosives were gone. He usually sends a report every six months, and his last was just a few weeks ago.
"He doesn't do that to report trivia," a European diplomat familiar with Dr. ElBaradei's views said. "It's something that is considered grave."
Haven't folks like the Times and Mr. Kerry just spent months telling us there was no grave danger in Iraq?
MORE:
Report: Explosives already gone when U.S. troops arrived: NBC News says its crew was embedded with soldiers at time (CNN, 10/26/04)
The mystery surrounding the disappearance of 380 tons of powerful explosives from a storage depot in Iraq has taken a new twist, after a network embedded with the U.S. military during the invasion of Iraq reported that the material had already vanished by the time American troops arrived.Posted by Orrin Judd at October 26, 2004 08:50 AMNBC News reported that on April 10, 2003, its crew was embedded with the U.S. Army's 101st Airborne Division when troops arrived at the Al Qaqaa storage facility south of Baghdad.
While the troops found large stockpiles of conventional explosives, they did not find HMX or RDX, the types of powerful explosives that reportedly went missing, according to NBC. [...]
[K]erry senior adviser Joe Lockhart fired back with a statement of his own, accusing the Bush campaign of "distorting" the NBC News report.
"In a shameless attempt to cover up its failure to secure 380 tons of highly explosive material in Iraq, the White House is desperately flailing in an effort to escape blame," Lockhart said. "It is the latest pathetic excuse from an administration that never admits a mistake, no matter how disastrous."
Lockhart did not elaborate on how the Bush campaign was distorting the NBC report.
Gray Lady lies?
Posted by: Uncle Bill at October 26, 2004 09:10 AMJoe Lockhart is the perfect spokesman for the Kerry campaign - he is tied to both Bill Clinton and Dan Rather.
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 26, 2004 10:36 AMIt's been doing so for 36 years that I know of, ever since the second NYC teacher strike.
Of course, before OJ et al jump all over me, I should point out that we know that individual Timesmen like Walter Duranty were quite comfortable lying about their hero, Uncle Joe Stalin, and his predations. But one probably cannot say that this lying was editorial policy unlike the sort in this article which has been Times stock in trade, certainly since aforementioned strike.
Posted by: Bart at October 26, 2004 10:43 AMOJ:
Oh, but it gets better: Apparently, CBS was planning to run this "story" the night before the election.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at October 26, 2004 01:07 PMI beg your pardon: two nights before the election.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at October 26, 2004 01:49 PMThis was apparently the "October Surprise" CBS and the Dems were hoping would throw the election in Kerry's favor. But it was debunked in less than 24 hrs. If this is the best they have, the election is over.
Posted by: jd watson at October 26, 2004 02:06 PMAnd the Pubies are just starting their "October Surprises":
1) Exposure of Kerry's prevarication on meeting with the entire UN Security Council prior to his vote authorizing the Iraq War;
2) Charges of plagiarism regarding Kerry's 1997 book;
3) Evidence that Kerry and his VVAW were useful idiots/fifth columnists for North Vietnam and the VC, and possibly(?) received financing from them.
All this, and it's only Tuesday.
Seems to me the most plausible explanation for the NYT rushing this one into print is that they wanted to run it, but already have some big story planned for Thursday that they figure is a better "October Surprise."
Posted by: brian at October 26, 2004 04:21 PM